View Single Post
Old 03-13-2012, 10:20 AM   #154
stonetools
Wizard
stonetools ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.stonetools ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.stonetools ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.stonetools ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.stonetools ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.stonetools ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.stonetools ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.stonetools ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.stonetools ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.stonetools ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.stonetools ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
stonetools's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,016
Karma: 2838487
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Washington, DC
Device: Ipad, IPhone
Quote:
Originally Posted by SeaKing View Post
Have you considered that the doubling of the market increased just because of greater demand, that it might have tripled if the prices were lower?

Quadrupled?
Heh, I notice that the "piracy doesn't hurt sales" folk resist that argument when content creators argue against piracy. When the same folks put on their "anti-agency pricing" hat, all of a sudden its "we can't prove a one to one loss of sales, but agency priciing does hurt sales".

I agree that agency pricing does hurt sales . That misses the point. The publishers instituted agency pricing above all to prevent Amazon from maintaining their monopoly of the ebook retail market. It did achieve that goal ( Amazon's share of the ebook market dropped from 90 to 60 per cent and other companies became ebook retailers). Thats a legit business objective, gi ven the right circumstances, according to the Supreme Court in a recent case.
stonetools is offline   Reply With Quote