View Single Post
Old 03-13-2012, 02:52 AM   #92
ignacio ferrer
Banned
ignacio ferrer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ignacio ferrer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ignacio ferrer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ignacio ferrer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ignacio ferrer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ignacio ferrer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ignacio ferrer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ignacio ferrer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ignacio ferrer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ignacio ferrer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ignacio ferrer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 200
Karma: 289206
Join Date: Dec 2011
Device: Onyx M92
Quote:
Originally Posted by howyoudoin View Post
It's a spin on the old "Why are you opposed to the government doing XYZ by invading your privacy if you have nothing to hide?" argument. It's the conflation of two issues in order to avoid addressing the main point. You can focus on the errant child and the apathetic parent, but that is no excuse to not address the issue of the lumping together of the guilty and the innocent.
The problem seems to be that you don't want to get the point that this is not a unique construction.
Say you live on rent in an apartment with your family and your kid plays music very loud and disturbs the rest of the house - then you will be held responsible and it is you who has to hold your kid responsible.
The landlord will not deal with the kid.
This has nothing to do with guilty or innocent.
Has to do with the contract you signed.
ignacio ferrer is offline   Reply With Quote