Quote:
Originally Posted by Giggleton
Those examples are fine and dandy like sour candy, what's to be upset about? Your second example presupposes the continuation of a system that allows artists to sell their work on the network. We envision a network where the act of selling is disabled, where it is only possible to buy. In this way no one would be able to steal anothers creation for profit. It's not a requirement for an end to copyright but it goes a long way toward realizing that end I think.
|
"We envision"? Who made you Queen of England?
If someone is buying, then someone is selling. If it is not the creator or the publisher, its the state. I am sure there are lots of authors who would love to write for the state....
--
Bill