View Single Post
Old 03-11-2012, 07:39 PM   #17
geekmaster
Carpe diem, c'est la vie.
geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
geekmaster's Avatar
 
Posts: 6,433
Karma: 10773670
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Multiverse 6627A
Device: K1 to PW3
Quote:
Originally Posted by ixtab View Post
Has this really happened, i.e. has that backdoor really been in the wild?

I read about it before, and some quick search came up with this. However I always thought that this was some proof-of-concept, not that it ever went into "production". Do you have some references for the US Army thing?
All I can find now is a statement that the hacked version of the compiler was never publicly released. This is contrary to what I read before (somewhere on the internet). As we know, information on the internet tends to not be there when you need it, but lasts forever if it is personally embarrassing. What I previously read may have been exaggerated, especially the part about the military, and my memory is not as good as it was when I was younger. But it is still a good story, and there are newer better hacks these days, like the Stuxnet variants the bad guys are sending "back at us".

EDIT: According to this, it was the US Navy, and it was done with their knowledge as part of a research project: http://books.google.com/books?id=_-1jwRwNaEoC&pg=PA378

Last edited by geekmaster; 03-11-2012 at 08:10 PM.
geekmaster is offline   Reply With Quote