View Single Post
Old 03-10-2012, 05:54 PM   #79
anamardoll
Chasing Butterflies
anamardoll ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anamardoll ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anamardoll ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anamardoll ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anamardoll ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anamardoll ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anamardoll ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anamardoll ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anamardoll ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anamardoll ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anamardoll ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
anamardoll's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,132
Karma: 5074169
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: American Southwest
Device: Uses batteries.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elfwreck View Post
Coker didn't just remove content; he publicly insulted the people who read and write that content:

He implies that reading fiction that contains bestiality supports *actual* abuse of animals, and that fiction containing underage characters in sexual situations is advocating pedophilia.
This. I'm so farking tired of privileged white men speaking out about things they do not understand, and particularly when the Do Not Understand topic is something like erotica which is, iiuc, largely produced and consumed by non-privileged-white-men.

I don't try to ban whatever online porn the privileged white men watch; stop banning erotic literature.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elfwreck View Post
I assure you that no credit card company allows necrophilia but not bestiality, and they don't allow explicit rapes in murder mysteries but not in romance stories. Nor do any of them have numbers indicating that ebooks of *any* sort are prone to high chargebacks. (I've been researching alternate payment systems for a while now.)

The specific form of this ban comes from PayPal, not the credit card companies, and shows both conflation of fiction to reality (implying that fiction about incest is somehow illegal, and so on) and a lack of comprehension of the variety of tropes and literary styles used in fiction.
Thank you. And nice reference to "Twilight" there, assuming you meant to. If not, even better.
anamardoll is offline   Reply With Quote