View Single Post
Old 03-10-2012, 07:56 AM   #78
SteveEisenberg
Grand Sorcerer
SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 7,438
Karma: 43514536
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: near Philadelphia USA
Device: Kindle Kids Edition, Fire HD 10 (11th generation)
There seems to be an assumption in a few posts that a child is more likely to be a copyright disrespecter than a parent. But for families with younger children, the parent may more likely be the violator.

If the British parliament passes the provision, it would be just like when the parent drinks away the money that would have gone to pay the ISP.


Quote:
Originally Posted by bla View Post
It's all a load of bollocks.... just how are you going to stop someone getting internet access???
And why would you want to? Disrespecting copyright is only mildly wrong and so should be only mildly sanctioned.
SteveEisenberg is offline   Reply With Quote