View Single Post
Old 03-10-2012, 07:29 AM   #73
SteveEisenberg
Grand Sorcerer
SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 7,435
Karma: 43514536
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: near Philadelphia USA
Device: Kindle Kids Edition, Fire HD 10 (11th generation)
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
In the UK, however, you can't get away with a driving offence by saying "I don't know who was driving the car at the time".
Nor here. Nor should it. No matter who committed the red light or parking violation, it is coming out of the total income available to our family, so it makes no difference.

If you live in a close family unit, your being sanctioned always hurts your family. That's true if you go to jail. That's true for fines. That's true if they turn off your internet for not paying the bill. And it would, of course, also be true if they turned off your internet for disrespecting copyright. This is not some specific unfairness of the service cancellation mandate mistakenly alleged to have been enacted by the British parliament. Rather it is part of the fundamental and unavoidable unfairness of life.

Do we want to keep that fundamental unfairness to a minimum? Yes. You do that by avoidance of excessive punishments, not by thinking we can dream up a sanction that only hurts one person.
SteveEisenberg is offline   Reply With Quote