Quote:
Originally Posted by howyoudoin
Even in your example, the underlying principle is still 'presumed innocent until proven guilty'. Which is fine, and no one has an argument with that. Cutting off the internet for the entire house has a 'presumed guilty until proven innocent' principle to it, because if you had really proven the guilt of the guilty person, you wouldn't be punishing the entire house.
|
They are not cutting off the internet immediately. You get two warnings, and a chance to do something about it. If you don't know what, you can contact them and you will get help. If you feel you have been wrongly accused (you suspect a hacker or something) they will investigate. So it is not as bad as you make it out to be. The basic principle, innocent until proven guilty, can still be upheld under the system.