Quote:
Originally Posted by hawhill
In earlier versions of Duokan - when it was still called simply "Duokan" - PDF rendering was also done using muPDF. I'm still angry at these guys for not releasing their source. Legal stuff aside, they just owe it to the community. But I'm not here for ranting, instead I'm a bit curious: what version of Duokan are you testing against?
|
Duokan 2012 R2.1, it was out a week ago; but pdf performance had been the same since R1.1. The difference is really big with image heavy files (mostly scanned physics/math books), from 4-5s in mupdf to less than 1s in duokan. I would love to know what they are using for rendering.