View Single Post
Old 03-08-2012, 07:46 AM   #100
Sil_liS
Wizard
Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 4,896
Karma: 33602910
Join Date: Oct 2010
Device: PocketBook 903 & 360+
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kali Yuga View Post
Uh, tax deductions for what? Certainly not for selling copyrighted content; that's good ol' taxable income. They get the same tax deductions as are available to anyone else.
What about this?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kali Yuga View Post
In post #69, you typed: "Coca-Cola and Pepsi can't say "you can only buy directly from us at triple the price that our distributors are offering"."
It is a fact that manufacturers and publishers can charge the general public twice or three times more or less than they charge for the wholesale price. They also can directly sell their products to the public for more or less than retailers selling the same product (though they will face the ire of their retailers if they charge less).
So you consider the wholesale price to be THE price, instead of a discounted one. I consider the list price to be THE price. If you look at the OP again you will see that the 300% is comes from the the library having to pay $120 instead of the $40 retail price. But if you consider the wholesale price to be the actual price of the book, then the libraries are being charged 600%.
Sil_liS is offline   Reply With Quote