View Single Post
Old 03-07-2012, 07:10 PM   #77
afv011
Captain Penguin
afv011 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.afv011 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.afv011 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.afv011 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.afv011 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.afv011 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.afv011 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.afv011 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.afv011 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.afv011 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.afv011 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
afv011's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,965
Karma: 2079999999
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Seattle, WA
Device: Kobo Clara BW, Kobo Libra 2, Nook Glowlight
Quote:
Originally Posted by jocampo View Post
My point is that we should not categorically say that CPU with more cores will use less power because like I explained on my previous post, and fjtorres also pointed on his, it will depend of many factors, like the software and Os itself.

You are right, for high intensive apps., the work will finish faster.
So, what about people who categorically say that more cores imply shorter battery life, without providing any backing-up? I didn't see you jumping up at Harry when he said so.

I stated that CPUs with more cores CAN (notice the verb) use less power than CPUs with less cores, and provided a link to back up my statement.
afv011 is offline