View Single Post
Old 03-06-2012, 12:17 PM   #43
Sil_liS
Wizard
Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 4,896
Karma: 33602910
Join Date: Oct 2010
Device: PocketBook 903 & 360+
Quote:
Originally Posted by QuantumIguana View Post
I would say no. An author can't take that income from anyone else. All they can do is to persuade the reader to buy their books. It is the reader's money until the reader decides where to spend it.
If I would have otherwise bought a book from author A, but now I'm buying a book from author B, then author A loses a source of income to author B.

Quote:
Originally Posted by QuantumIguana View Post
If there were one publisher, yes. But with multiple publishers, they want to shove the other publishers books off the shelves. Look at Coke and Pepsi, they put out so many variations of their products, and one of the reasons they do this is to dominate shelf space.
If their interest would have been shoving the other publishers off the shelf they would have lowered the book prices. Coke and Pepsi dominate the shelves especially when they have sales.
Sil_liS is offline   Reply With Quote