Quote:
Originally Posted by anamardoll
I would think the friend's point is that B&N gives MORE money to the Democrat party than she has available to give and she would like to encourage that.
I don't actually see what's wrong with that, particularly since the friend in question is female and (presumably) thinks that a life of being perpetually pregnant would cut into her reading time.
|
1. I don't think that B&N "grows" the "friends" money. It will just pass on a part of all the "friends'" money, so that logic is faulty.
2. As for as what the friend "thinks" that is already suspect and you have given it the coup de grace with that picture of her eternally in a birthing bed. On another side, taking it that far, all the resultant child support will help her buy many books to read while being permanently bedridden, and a nice house to store the books and children in.
3. I give credit in getting the best laugh of the week from this "friend's" thinking.
Quote:
Originally Posted by stonetools
I should have snipped out the part that referred to political contributions. 
Let's keep it non-political . |
It wasn't really political. It was a smaller question of economics without any discussion of policies or practices, by you stonetools or myself.