View Single Post
Old 03-02-2012, 05:10 PM   #275
latepaul
Wizard
latepaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.latepaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.latepaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.latepaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.latepaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.latepaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.latepaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.latepaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.latepaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.latepaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.latepaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
latepaul's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,270
Karma: 10468300
Join Date: Dec 2011
Device: a variety (mostly kindles and kobos)
Quote:
Originally Posted by anamardoll View Post
The author's copyright means that they have the right to deny a place the ability to distribute their book.
That's true but the $64,000 question is whether the re-downloading of a book you paid for from a site who had the rights at the time but no longer does counts as "distributing". IANAL so I don't know for sure.

Suppose B&N took over Dropbox - or did a deal with them - and automatically created a copy of the file in your dropbox folder when you purchased a book. Would you expect them to also delete that file when the author removed the book?

ITSM that offering a book for sale and offering to keep an online back up of a file (which happens to be an ebook) are two distinct things, legally distinguishable. So it's not automatically clear to me that allowing you to still download your B&N books is "distributing" them and to my mind it's not. But again IANAL.

However in order for these two things to be actually distinct the B&N computer systems have to support it and it sounds like at the moment the author has a big "remove" button and it deletes the book from B&N servers altogether. If so the author of course has to use that button to fulfil their agreement with Amazon.

Quote:
I'm upset at the author for revoking the book license, not Amazon or B&N.
I can understand that and if I were an author I wouldn't sign with Select. However I'm not convinced that an author can retroactively rescind my right to a copy I've legitimately acquired.
latepaul is offline   Reply With Quote