View Single Post
Old 03-02-2012, 04:24 PM   #272
latepaul
Wizard
latepaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.latepaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.latepaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.latepaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.latepaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.latepaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.latepaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.latepaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.latepaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.latepaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.latepaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
latepaul's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,270
Karma: 10468300
Join Date: Dec 2011
Device: a variety (mostly kindles and kobos)
I don't like what Amazon are trying to do in terms of exclusivity and potential monopolies, but I am not surprised they are trying to do it.

However I'm not sure you can blame them for another company removing a download link. I suspect it's just that B&N systems don't have a way to separate out "this book is for sale" and "this is not for sale but can be re-downloaded by people who already paid for it" and so to remove the one you have to remove the other. A re-download link only available to an account that legitimately paid for it, is in effect a digital locker and no different in principle to a Dropbox account. I don't think that can be considered to be distributing it because you're not offering it to anyone new.

If I were a B&N customer and my download link went missing then I'd be asking them about it. They are the ones I paid money to.
latepaul is offline   Reply With Quote