View Single Post
Old 03-02-2012, 08:55 AM   #26
murraypaul
Interested Bystander
murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 3,726
Karma: 19728152
Join Date: Jun 2008
Device: Note 4, Kobo One
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sil_liS View Post
I thought that "mandate" meant permission, not requirement. Going from this I understood that the author of the article said that ACTA doesn't give custom officials the permission to inspect your laptop. The text of ACTA shows otherwise.
It is an interesting question. I had taken it in the sense of mandatory, so it will not be mandatory for officers to do so. I think that is more likely than that they will not be given a mandate to do so, but English is a funny language.
murraypaul is offline   Reply With Quote