View Single Post
Old 03-01-2012, 04:33 PM   #68
QuantumIguana
Philosopher
QuantumIguana ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.QuantumIguana ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.QuantumIguana ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.QuantumIguana ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.QuantumIguana ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.QuantumIguana ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.QuantumIguana ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.QuantumIguana ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.QuantumIguana ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.QuantumIguana ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.QuantumIguana ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
QuantumIguana's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,034
Karma: 18736532
Join Date: Jan 2012
Device: Kindle Paperwhite 2 gen, Kindle Fire 1st Gen, Kindle Touch
Quote:
The question was in regards to Ulysses S. Grant, not just anyone.
Grant was only one example, it is applicable to any author.

Quote:
In regards to other, mid-list authors, they've probably written one or more works already since they're on any list at all and made money from those. In any case I doubt many people today or henceforth will think: "oh darn, it seems I'm nearing the end of my days. Time to sit down and write a whopping big best seller so my descendants will have an income in perpetuity".
So, because they made some money, that means they have made enough? Why in the world would you think that an author wouldn't continue writing to provide for their family? If their other books sold, it is reasonable that this book would sell too. And the issue isn't perpetual copyright, but the assertion that copyright should end at the author's death.
QuantumIguana is offline   Reply With Quote