View Single Post
Old 03-01-2012, 03:21 PM   #48
Belfaborac
Wizard
Belfaborac ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Belfaborac ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Belfaborac ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Belfaborac ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Belfaborac ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Belfaborac ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Belfaborac ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Belfaborac ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Belfaborac ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Belfaborac ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Belfaborac ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Belfaborac's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,498
Karma: 5199835
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Norway
Device: Sony PRS-505, PRS-950
Quote:
Originally Posted by QuantumIguana View Post
I don't recall anyone saying there was anything wrong with that.
It seemed to me to be what bill_mchale suggested, strictly unspoken though it was.

Quote:
Who is saying no one will do X unless they can make money at it? But people do have less incentive to create if they can't make money at it.
Once again, that appeared to me to be the suggestion.

Quote:
In the last year of his life, Ulysses S. Grant found out he was dying of cancer. He sat down and wrote his memoir, to provide for his family, as he was destitute. It was published shortly after his death. If the copyright had been limited to his own life, his family would have made no money, thus the incentive to write his memoirs would not have existed.
Why is it that his family would have made no money? They would likely have made less money, but less does not actually equal nothing.
Belfaborac is offline   Reply With Quote