Quote:
Originally Posted by darryl
I disagree. Overall I think the letter is good. Whilst your interpretation is open, it is not the only one. Judging by this thread, at least one other person has interpreted it similarly to you, and others have not. I suppose his success as a spokesman in this instance depends on whether or not significant numbers of people have been offended as you have, and the extent to which the letter could have been written effectively whilst avoiding him "blowing his own trumpet", so to speak.
In any event, it seems that virtually all posters here agree to some extent with the sentiments expressed.
|
He doesn't offend me. I'm just prone to ignore people who carry on that way; whether I agree with them or not.