Quote:
Originally Posted by Prestidigitweeze
None of this strikes me as particularly honest. If the person who originally posted that statement doesn't like the idea of others reading erotica about beasts and werewolves, then they should have the guts to stand by their convictions and not use insincere provocation to disrupt a dialogue. And if that isn't what they intended to do, then they should apologize for stubbornly using words incorrectly and annoying other people.
|
I imagine I'm the person to whom you are referring. You can see what I've said. There was nothing dishonest or insincere about it. I won't apologize for it. I don't like the idea of others reading books of this type; I am opposed to the existence of these types of books. I'm more opposed to banning free speech. Another poster called this a non sequitur, but I think they meant a veridical paradox. It seems like a contradiction, but both statements can be true at the same time. This is not an incorrect use of language.