View Single Post
Old 02-29-2012, 12:19 PM   #25
Sil_liS
Wizard
Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 4,896
Karma: 33602910
Join Date: Oct 2010
Device: PocketBook 903 & 360+
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrscoach View Post
Neutral corners.
I think we all agree that the letter states that 'the internet' is its users and WE do not want corporations/governments telling us what we can and cannot view.
I disagree, because the government does tell people what they can and cannot view (think of film ratings that restrict the viewers). I think that the internet is the way to get the information across, and I think that the author of the letter sees it as a tool:
Quote:
Because we will not have the Internet censored, we are also implacably hostile to any attempts to impose controls on it that could be used for censorship – whether or not that is the stated intent of the controls.
Sil_liS is offline   Reply With Quote