View Single Post
Old 02-23-2012, 09:00 PM   #448
Wasgo
Connoisseur
Wasgo ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Wasgo ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Wasgo ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Wasgo ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Wasgo ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Wasgo ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Wasgo ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Wasgo ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Wasgo ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Wasgo ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Wasgo ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 82
Karma: 1060105
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Device: Kobo Wi-Fi
Theft consists of two primary effects:

1. A person obtains something they have no right to own.
2. A person loses something they have a right to own.

Copyright infringement only has one of these two effects, specifically the first one.

Conversely, we can construct a situation that consists of only the second one, such as someone purposely smashing a person's e-reader that was placed on the table in front of them.

Nobody would call the second situation theft, but clearly it falls into the category of doing something wrong. It's equally possible for copyright infringement to be wrong, without claiming that it's theft.
Wasgo is offline   Reply With Quote