Quote:
Originally Posted by HansTWN
If someone knows about WiFi security they have WPA2 protection already, and some may even have MAC access restrictions. If they don't know how to do it (and are running an unsecured network) then they are very unlikely to even think of that being the problem after receiving the first round of letters.
Anyway, what was the harm for those 810,000? They received a warning and stopped (or they were never downloading anything in the first place and it was a false alarm). Justice has been done in these cases, they got a reminder to respect other people's property and that is it.
|
The 810,000 warnings cost money. Justice has not been done. Either they secured their networks or they switched to VPN, nothing has changed. Well that is not true, now other governments will have the reason to spend money on this kind of frivolous actions.