Quote:
Originally Posted by Sil_liS
How do you know that the 880,000 weren't wrongly accused? Considering that one person was wrongly accused 3 times in a row that seems very likely. The 810,000 might have just improved the security of their wifi or something.
|
If someone knows about WiFi security they have WPA2 protection already, and some may even have MAC access restrictions. If they don't know how to do it (and are running an unsecured network) then they are very unlikely to even think of that being the problem after receiving the first round of letters.
Anyway, what was the harm for those 810,000? They received a warning and stopped (or they were never downloading anything in the first place and it was a false alarm). Justice has been done in these cases, they got a reminder to respect other people's property and that is it.