View Single Post
Old 02-22-2012, 11:27 AM   #54
Sil_liS
Wizard
Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 4,896
Karma: 33602910
Join Date: Oct 2010
Device: PocketBook 903 & 360+
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kali Yuga View Post
On what basis do you make that claim? The example given in the article was of someone who cleared up a misunderstanding after receiving a third warning, and before going to court.
It wasn't a third warning, it was a third accusation:
Quote:
Mr. Thollot was accused of illegally downloading songs by David Guetta and Rihanna, as well as the film “Iron Man 2.”
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kali Yuga View Post
Incorrect, a hearing with a judge is required before fines or sanctions can be levied.
I wasn't talking about the fines, but about your comment:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kali Yuga View Post
Or, if they can demonstrate that it's not their fault, they are not punished.
According to your interpretation the accused needs to prove their innocence, and this is a case of guilty until proven innocent. Which is what I said.
Sil_liS is offline   Reply With Quote