|
The e-book has the potential to be Orwell's memory hole. Paper books stay written, if someone comes out with a whitewashed version, it is easier to tell what was the original version.
E-books place an added cost on readers, which could be several hundred dollars for a large family. No technology is required for reading paper books.
There are some people you may not want to give an e-reader to, such as small children or prisoners.
If I want you to read something as opposed to you wanting me to read something, a paper book may make more sense. A church might continue to stock paper bibles for a very long time, for example.
One advantage of paper books is that your bookshelf tells people who you are. You can learn a lot about someone by the books on their shelves. If there are no paper books, then the living rooms of readers look just like that of non-readers. I have been in the houses of people who have no books, and I find it a bit creepy.
However, I do suppose some might find it a disadvantage for people to know what books you are reading.
With paper books, you can give them away when you are done with them, and you can buy used books. Without the secondary market, the effective cost of e-books is higher than it is for paper, as you pay full price for all the e-books. Of course, you have to consider all the PD books that you don't have to pay for at all in e-book format.
|