View Single Post
Old 02-13-2012, 10:14 AM   #146
pdurrant
The Grand Mouse 高貴的老鼠
pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
pdurrant's Avatar
 
Posts: 73,728
Karma: 315126578
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Norfolk, England
Device: Kindle Oasis
Quote:
Originally Posted by stonetools View Post
I understand why the booksellers and the publishers opted for speed and ease over full disclosure. But land sakes a mercy, they have unleashed an unending tsunami of nonsense on these internets.
I'm not sure that you do understand. Don't forget that if ebook sales are sales of licenses and not sales of copies, then most contracts specify a much higher percentage cut to the author for sales of licences than sales of copies.

Eminem recently won a case to do with this on music sales.

Publishers (of music and books) currently want it both ways. When talking to content providers (authors, musicians) electronic sales are just another sale, like a hardback or a CD. When talking to end users, electronic sales are licences, completely different to sales of hardback and CDs.

It'll get settled eventually, but we're definitely in early days and the rules haven't been sorted out yet.
pdurrant is offline   Reply With Quote