Quote:
Originally Posted by QuantumIguana
I do not concede the point, and I haven't changed the subject. There simply is no possible way to interpret his article as calling for copyright to be limited. Even at life +70 years, he still calls that stealing, the equivalent of slavery or confiscating farms. His point is that there should be no point where the work enters the public domain.
|
You changed the subject when you went from "how many interpretations are there" to "he's a liar."
You conceeded the point because there is no way for him to be a liar unless there are two interpretations.