View Single Post
Old 02-06-2012, 06:11 PM   #77
frahse
occasional author
frahse ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.frahse ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.frahse ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.frahse ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.frahse ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.frahse ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.frahse ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.frahse ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.frahse ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.frahse ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.frahse ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
frahse's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,315
Karma: 2064403292
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Wandering God's glorious hills, valleys and plains.
Device: A Franklin BI (before Internet) was the first. I still have it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by taosaur View Post
The headscratcher is that you seem to think "trying to write future classics" is a genre. Classics come from all genres and none. They're simply works that have endured from past eras and continue to be found worthy of study. I'm not sure anyone could actually complete a novel with the approach that they were "trying to write future classics."
My friend please let your head be. I did not name any book or type of books as a "future classic." Someone else did. For reference only, did I call them a genre. It is all pretty vague in fact, but we should deal with the names that were used in order to maintain clarity and continuity, and one of the names was "future classic."
frahse is offline   Reply With Quote