View Single Post
Old 02-05-2012, 11:04 AM   #85
cjr72
Groupie
cjr72 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cjr72 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cjr72 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cjr72 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cjr72 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cjr72 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cjr72 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cjr72 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cjr72 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cjr72 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cjr72 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 172
Karma: 2900000
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: A Yankee in Texas
Device: Nexus 6p, Nexus 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by stonetools View Post
This is what's called cherry picking a quote. Neil Gaiman may believe that piracy helps sales- many well known authors disagree. Certainly Mr. Gaiman 's publisher disagrees
I'm sure the publishers would disagree but history shows that the content industry is often spectacularly wrong in that regard. Google VCR and the Boston Strangler.

Quote:
Originally Posted by stonetools View Post
and it is [the publishers], not Mr. Gaiman, who would have detailed knowledge of his sales figures
Call me naive but I don't find it hard to believe that Neil Gaiman has sufficient knowledge of sales figures for books authored by Neil Gaiman.

Quote:
Originally Posted by stonetools View Post
In any case, both of these authors have a perfect right to give away their works if they want- that's why its called COPYRIGHT . It doesn't mean that there is any sanction for pirating any other author's work.
Point missed entirely. It's that works that can be found for free (sanctioned or not) does not necessarily preclude healthy growth in sales as Neil Gaiman found out.
cjr72 is offline   Reply With Quote