Quote:
Originally Posted by ixtab
OK, I'm jumping back in and admit I actually did clean up both in git and on Transifex 
Revision https://bitbucket.org/katey_hack/kin...t/0814057c2c36 is the last one based purely on 5.0.0, later revisions involve removal of some resources (containing only blacklisted entries), as well as inclusion of the single update there.
In other words: I completely agree with eureka, and suggest to tag 0814057c2c36 as 5.0.0, and continue the new one as 5.0.3. About the naming: IMO your second proposal (src/5.0.3/{framework,locale,pillow,waf}) is best. Since you're the "master of slug-naming tools"  , could you update the repo and transifex accordingly?
Thanks! |
OK, but I'm a bit confused. I've listed some variants with
5.0.3 and new sub-directory. Are you agreeing with this one:
Quote:
Originally Posted by eureka
So the label "5.0.0" at Git repo and Transifex.net (as a sub-directory in repo, part of slug/name of resource at Transifex) will be turned into misleading. It will be not the 5.0.0 anymore. We have to [...] promote it to 5.0.3, making src/5.0.3/{framework,locale,pillow,waf} as path to resources
|