View Single Post
Old 01-31-2012, 04:02 PM   #112
nonobjective
Member
nonobjective is that somebody.nonobjective is that somebody.nonobjective is that somebody.nonobjective is that somebody.nonobjective is that somebody.nonobjective is that somebody.nonobjective is that somebody.nonobjective is that somebody.nonobjective is that somebody.nonobjective is that somebody.nonobjective is that somebody.
 
nonobjective's Avatar
 
Posts: 19
Karma: 45616
Join Date: Jan 2012
Device: Sony 500, Kindle Keyboard, Kindle Touch, Paperwhite
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elfwreck View Post
It offers no resistance to large-scale unauthorized filesharing. It impedes many types of fair use, and casual sharing among family members. The objection is to the hype that the impairment of legitimate uses--switching devices, getting a new OS, sharing with a spouse--is somehow acceptable because it "prevents piracy."

In short: it penalizes legitimate users while offering no detriments to mass uploaders.
I agree with everything you said. What I disagreed with was the following:

Quote:
Originally Posted by pdurrant View Post
I'd say it doesn't prevent piracy at all.
I don't mind hyperbole in the least, but when it's offered as a contrast to the more accurate original statement it just strikes me as chest thumping.
nonobjective is offline   Reply With Quote