Quote:
Originally Posted by leebase
I'm happy Apple didn't go with "the standard" given THERE IS NO STANDARD that covered what Apple needed done.
|
What was it exactly that Apple needed? I'm talking about functionality because HarryT's example isn't about functionality:
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT
That's right. ePub 3, for example, does "programmability" using Javascript. A ".iBook" file does it using using a custom Apple scripting language.
|
And if Apple thought that there are different needs than what was covered by the standard then why make the standard like this?