Quote:
Originally Posted by Harmon
You have accused Ana of "illegal acts."
I've asked you to specify what acts she has committed that you believe to be illegal.
Instead of replying by identifying the acts, you just blow some smoke about "acts that are against the law."
It's not quibbling to request you to be specific. The reason is that some copying is legal, and some illegal. From what I've read in her posts, she has done nothing illegal, but perhaps your eagle eye has spotted something I missed.
So either retract your accusation, or back it up with specifics.
|
Wow, you do hang on... it's just taken 10 minutes to back trace this whole damn section of the thread (which you could have done yourself) and which is
as is usual once people start asking for specifics rather than reading what has been written... usually a good way to obscure what has been said in a morass of accusations that don't relate to the words written... but you're good at that in your postings...
Ana said, "So let me see if I get this straight.
If a digital edition will never exist, you think disabled people shouldn't download the
pirate version, even though the
pirate version will not hurt the artist because there is
no legal legitimate version (in this case a DVD) and the disabled person cannot give money to the artist in the approved way (in this case live shows) because they are disabled?"
Now that clearly talks about downloading the pirate version and not being legitimate which is what I was referring to... I never accused ana of
doing anything other than approving (or not disapproving) of such acts... next time you want specifics, read the damn thread yourself one word at a time so that you understand it before jumping up and down in mock outrage...