View Single Post
Old 01-27-2012, 06:31 PM   #28
SeaKing
Frequent Flier
SeaKing ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SeaKing ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SeaKing ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SeaKing ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SeaKing ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SeaKing ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SeaKing ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SeaKing ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SeaKing ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SeaKing ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SeaKing ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
SeaKing's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,282
Karma: 2058993297
Join Date: Oct 2011
Device: KB kindle aboard, Galx Tab 7.0 Plus, trying out Droid 1 as mini-tab
Ok. I see what some of you are saying.
An example: (I will just throw some numbers into it to make a point.)
A company spends 50 Billion dollars operating.
Gets back 50 Billion dollars plus $1.
A pretty terrible margin, but yes they didn't lose money overall.
If that is your point, you are exactly right.

Now I ask a question. Why did Verizon's margin decrease so much?
Why did AT&Ts?

Did it have something to do with the large subsidies for the iPhones? Something to do with the customers continually upgrading so that they got more subsidies?

Was it in part because Verizon "lost money" on its iPhone business?
I think the answer is yes, for that is what the article implies.
That is what the financial boys said.

Or was it just "karma?"

That bad karma can be a real *****!
SeaKing is offline   Reply With Quote