View Single Post
Old 01-27-2012, 06:49 AM   #134
murraypaul
Interested Bystander
murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 3,726
Karma: 19728152
Join Date: Jun 2008
Device: Note 4, Kobo One
Quote:
Originally Posted by BWinmill View Post
Big difference. Apple is saying that you can use their tool for commercial use if and only if you use them as the vendor. Even though this is not an entirely new concept, it is not an entirely accepted concept either. As others have pointed out: it is like Microsoft telling you that you can only sell your Word document through their store. It is like Adobe saying that you can only publish your Photoshop documents through their store. And so on.
It is like Microsoft saying that games developed for the XBox 360 can only be sold with their approval and giving them a cut, or Sony saying that for the PS3, or Nintendo saying that for the Wii and DS.
All of which are true.
murraypaul is offline   Reply With Quote