View Single Post
Old 01-26-2012, 11:56 AM   #80
Iphinome
Paladin of Eris
Iphinome ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Iphinome ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Iphinome ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Iphinome ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Iphinome ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Iphinome ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Iphinome ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Iphinome ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Iphinome ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Iphinome ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Iphinome ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Iphinome's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,119
Karma: 20849349
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: USAland
Device: Kindle 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by ApK View Post
Really? So if some groups is distributing an artist work illegally, they should be free to continue distributing it illegally, saturating the market, undermining the artist ability make a living, indefinitely why the group's off-shore lawyers tie the artist up in court while "defending" their illegal actions?

Do you extend this blanket opposition to temporary injunctions to people selling unsafe counterfeit car parts, dangerous counterfeit medications, and fraudulent financial products?
I support due process. I support being able to put on a defense before being punished. I reject the idea of censorship first, a court battle later, if you can afford one. If you want a prior restraint you can at least allow the accused parties the chance to object before a judge before a take down is issued.

Are you not familiar with anti-slapp legislation?
Iphinome is offline   Reply With Quote