View Single Post
Old 01-26-2012, 02:47 AM   #269
Giggleton
Banned
Giggleton ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Giggleton ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Giggleton ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Giggleton ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Giggleton ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Giggleton ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Giggleton ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Giggleton ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Giggleton ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Giggleton ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Giggleton ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 1,687
Karma: 4368191
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Oregon
Device: Kindle3
Quote:
Originally Posted by SteveEisenberg View Post
You'd think it to be basic economics. And yet this National Bureau of Economic Research document I previously linked gives quite a bit of evidence in the other direction.

What I think is that the existence of copyright gives the public not more art, but better art. My Exhibit A is Sir Walter Scott, who, after Ivanhoe, wrote too fast because lack of international copyright protection meant he had to churn out books to pay bills.
It seems to me that taking away the ability of authors to sell, but increasing the options for readers to pay would solve this ivanhoe problem.
Giggleton is offline   Reply With Quote