I'm moving this discussion of improving the documentation to a new thread.
Quote:
Roger:
What are the improved table-handling capabilities in the Python distiller?
Hacker:
Well, Plucker Desktop does not support tables (nor does JPluck or Sunrise), but the Python and C++ Plucker distillers do, when passed the --tables argument to the parsing commandline.
|
There are different ways we can handle this circumstance:
- I can notify you by email that the documentation doesn't have anything about tables.
- I (or anybody) can post a question in this forum and someone can sketch out an answer or point to a URI where the answer can/may be found.
If your grandmother is anything like me

knowing that there is a --tables argument isn't enough to know what to do.
So I suggest that there be four levels in this documentation update:
- Simple identification of an error or omission or discrepancy between the program's behavior and the documentation or confusion about the program's operation
- Listing known differences between the latest version of the program and the documentation
- An explanation describing a new feature
- A complete segment suitable for adding to the public documentation
Personally, I'm only capable of steps 1 and 4, and I'm not yet knowledgeable to explore the program properly to do step 4 unless someone does step 3.
I guess I'm saying I need an education in the program before I can contribute in any substantive way, which inclines me towards using this forum to get steps 2 and 3 handled. I know you suggested sending email to you. Is there some alternative to piling more stuff in your inbox? I guess I'm thinking of how this might be handled in a wiki, though I'm not proposing setting up one.
Hm-m-m. Any other thoughts out there?
Roger