View Single Post
Old 01-25-2012, 05:46 AM   #29
HarryT
eBook Enthusiast
HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
HarryT's Avatar
 
Posts: 85,557
Karma: 93980341
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soldim View Post
They EULA is interesting in this regards, since it creates an exclusive distributorship. My (and many others) interpretation of US copyright law is that including such a clause in a EULA won't hold up on court. Since claiming exclusive distributorship implies a de facto transfer of (part of) the copyright this needs a written statement or contract (exact words in the Copyright Act: "an instrument of conveyance, or a note or memorandum of the transfer").
I must respectfully disagree. It's perfectly OK to voluntarily enter into a contract which grants more restricted rights than copyright law grants. That's the entire point - all this is entirely voluntary - nobody is forcing anyone to use iBooks Author who does not wish to do so.
HarryT is offline   Reply With Quote