View Single Post
Old 01-22-2012, 08:27 PM   #32
Tony1988
Guru
Tony1988 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tony1988 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tony1988 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tony1988 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tony1988 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tony1988 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tony1988 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tony1988 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tony1988 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tony1988 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tony1988 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 718
Karma: 4033862
Join Date: Jun 2011
Device: sony prs-350
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lemurion View Post
The idea behind this law is for law enforcement to get inside the pirates' "reaction loop" so that they can take offending sites down before the pirates can shift servers. The problem is that the only way they can figure out to do this is to ignore due process.

A site such as Youtube could be taken down because someone had uploaded a video of their child singing along to a copyrighted song on the radio. It trades the presumption of innocence for a presumption of guilt, eliminates the right to face your accuser, and basically puts the accused in a position where all their assets can be seized and frozen before they have an opportunity to answer the charges, let alone mount a defense.

It's a bad law.
I doubt that would happen. Again I still think the underlying reason for so many not wanting this is because it will limit what they will have to view and listen to online for free. I highly doubt the recording industry is going to eliminate a video of a kid singing along to a song on the radio.
Tony1988 is offline   Reply With Quote