View Single Post
Old 01-22-2012, 08:14 PM   #35
fjtorres
Grand Sorcerer
fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 11,732
Karma: 128354696
Join Date: May 2009
Location: 26 kly from Sgr A*
Device: T100TA,PW2,PRS-T1,KT,FireHD 8.9,K2, PB360,BeBook One,Axim51v,TC1000
Quote:
Originally Posted by ATDrake View Post
Whether or not ePub has been anointed as a "standard" in your view is irrelevant. It was created to be an open standard interoperable royalty-free format by the IDPF, and is documented as one, such that people know how it should behave and how to implement tools that work with it.
All that makes it a *specification* not a standard.
There is a difference.

There are dozens of international standard-setting bodies (ISO, ECMA, etc); epub has been certified by none and has been submitted to none. It builds on true standards like HTML and XML but it is not itself a product standard.
More, true standards come with trademarks and certification penalties and enforcement power behind them.

<idpf> control over epub ends once they "flip it over the wall" to implementers, which is why implementers get away with messing with it.
<idpf> doesn't really care about implementation or it wouldn't be looking the other way at what is going on.
That is not how true standards are maintained.
fjtorres is offline   Reply With Quote