View Single Post
Old 01-17-2012, 01:56 PM   #55
RHWright
Addict
RHWright ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RHWright ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RHWright ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RHWright ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RHWright ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RHWright ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RHWright ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RHWright ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RHWright ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RHWright ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RHWright ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 219
Karma: 2617122
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: North Carolina
Device: NOOK ST, Nexus 7
Didn't vote for either of these extremes.

My opinion, in brief: copyright should be life + 20 years. (That way any minor children are covered when a parent dies.)
Provisions would have to be worked out for collective works and works-for-hire.
Trademarks should be short-term but extendable. Also they must be limited and specific. See: Droid. (Why Lucas should get paid every time someone buys a phone, I just don't get.)
Patents should be short-term and subject to challenge if not brought to market. (No "conceptual" patents that you can't produce. Wait for someone else to produce a similar product and then suing them for "infringement.")
RHWright is offline   Reply With Quote