View Single Post
Old 01-16-2012, 12:06 PM   #107
GlennD
Wizard
GlennD ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GlennD ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GlennD ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GlennD ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GlennD ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GlennD ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GlennD ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GlennD ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GlennD ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GlennD ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GlennD ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 2,119
Karma: 17500000
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: The Pacific NW
Device: sony PRS350, iPhone, iPad
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven Lyle Jordan View Post
Another silly idea: Humanoid robots with outside-accessible off switches (Data, C3PO, etc). Shouldn't they, at least, be difficult to find or activate? Who needs a robot that can be easily turned off, by accident or on purpose, in a tight situation? The whole "this thing is deadly, but if you can hit it just here, that will shut it off" trope is insanely stoopid.
I would consider an accessible off switch to be a requirement for a robot - no one has created non-buggy software yet, and a robot could go crazy at any second. Or at least that's what all the stories tell me. It also depends on purpose - you wouldn't want a security robot being deactivated by an intruder for example, but a more general purpose robot could be easy to shut down without impacting its usefulness.
GlennD is offline   Reply With Quote