View Single Post
Old 12-30-2011, 06:39 PM   #24
J. Strnad
Guru
J. Strnad ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.J. Strnad ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.J. Strnad ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.J. Strnad ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.J. Strnad ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.J. Strnad ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.J. Strnad ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.J. Strnad ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.J. Strnad ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.J. Strnad ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.J. Strnad ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
J. Strnad's Avatar
 
Posts: 915
Karma: 3537194
Join Date: Feb 2009
Device: Kobo, Kindle 3, Paperwhite
Harold Pinter's play Betrayal moves backwards in time, examining an extramarital affair from its end to its beginning. I believe Jeremy Irons stars in the film version. It works extremely well, but then, Pinter is damn good.

The book I'm writing now began with a non-linear narrative. My test readers didn't get it and were confused by what was going on, even though I felt I bent over backwards to make it clear what was happening "now" and what took place twenty years previously.

I decided to rewrite it in a linear form and made a discovery: the "now" story was feeble and couldn't stand on its own! I was just amusing myself with the structure and failed to tell a good story. So, now I'm in the middle of a page-one rewrite and complete rethinking of the concept.

Overall, I'd guess that more readers are turned off by non-linear storytelling than are excited by it, whereas everyone likes a well-told story that starts at the beginning, proceeds through the middle, and then stops at the end.
J. Strnad is offline   Reply With Quote