Quote:
Originally Posted by anamardoll
And, again, both you and the other poster so very interested in engaging with me on this issue have apparently not read (or have forgotten) the post I was responding to, which was someone who Did Not Read The Article until after they posted in the first 10 posts that Amazon can do anything they want because it's their store and everyone should stop talking about it now because Amazon Makes The Rules.
|
With all due respect, it is you who have forgotten the post. The "Amazon can do what they want" aspect is not what you wrote about.
TechnoCat's issue with your post was about your claim that people should stop saying that it is one side of the story, because it is apparently an attempt at "derailing tactic". That implies that you are accusing him of deliberately attempting to mislead or perhaps direct the flow of conversation. That is an accusation against a poster without any evidence.
I don't think he was attempting to halt any conversation about the article. What he said was "although, we are only hearing one side of the story. i will reserve judgement until there are more facts." Not the pronoun
I in the quote.
So how can you accuse him of trying to stop conversation?
I am almost amused at your indignant (and, I suspect, somewhat angry) response, considering that I hardly said anything that damning. I hope the reasons behind my initial post are now clear.