No, my POV is that when someone says, "Wow that article seems pretty damaging" and someone else trips over themselves to post that WE ONLY KNOW ONE SIDE STOP TALKING NOW, then it's derailing and it should be deemed as such.
As is, you know, arguing with me ad nasuem about this in deliberately bad faith because none of the above is anything I've said or implied or thought or indicated. I mean, we're seriously into John McClane interpretation now.
ETA: Also, the statement was made something like 7 posts in by someone who had ALREADY defended Amazon reflexively without reading the article.
I'm not responding to you again on this issue.
Last edited by anamardoll; 12-29-2011 at 09:45 AM.
|