View Single Post
Old 12-29-2011, 03:44 AM   #58
tubemonkey
monkey on the fringe
tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
tubemonkey's Avatar
 
Posts: 45,776
Karma: 158733736
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Seattle Metro
Device: Moto E6, Echo Show
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ralph Sir Edward View Post
This is an inherent difference. Because of this difference, a different legal structure needs to be in place for each kind of property, acknowedging the unique characteristics of each type. And because of those differences, the rules are not going to be the same, due to those very same differences.
That's because a bunch of people made these distinctions and created laws based on them. They could just as easily ignore these differences and nullify these laws. There's nothing sacrosanct about any of this.

As far as I'm concerned, people have a right to pass on property of any kind to their heirs for an indefinite period of time. It's their property and I'm tired of society fabricating rationalizations so they can justify its theft.

These laws are antiquated and need changing; but I don't see it happening. At least the same system that created these unjust laws has the decency to keep extending copyright. So there is a silver lining in this cloud.
tubemonkey is offline   Reply With Quote