View Single Post
Old 12-28-2011, 06:09 PM   #53
Apache
Readaholic
Apache ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Apache ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Apache ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Apache ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Apache ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Apache ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Apache ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Apache ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Apache ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Apache ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Apache ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Apache's Avatar
 
Posts: 5,267
Karma: 90000484
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: South Georgia
Device: Surface Pro 6 / Galaxy Tab A 8"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ralph Sir Edward View Post
Here's a clear distiction between the two.

Can you make a copy of a farm? A copy of the same land, the same improvements? How about 10,000 copies? I'm not talking about taking another piece of land and making it a farm, I mean a copy, that no part of it ever existed before.

Of course not. Can't be done.

But you can make an infinite number of copies of a piece of "Intellectual Property".

This is an inherent difference. Because of this difference, a different legal structure needs to be in place for each kind of property, acknowedging the unique characteristics of each type. And because of those differences, the rules are not going to be the same, due to those very same differences.
Coming from a family of farmers, Well Said.
Apache
Apache is offline   Reply With Quote