View Single Post
Old 12-28-2011, 04:29 PM   #362
Elfwreck
Grand Sorcerer
Elfwreck ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Elfwreck ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Elfwreck ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Elfwreck ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Elfwreck ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Elfwreck ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Elfwreck ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Elfwreck ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Elfwreck ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Elfwreck ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Elfwreck ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Elfwreck's Avatar
 
Posts: 5,187
Karma: 25133758
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: SF Bay Area, California, USA
Device: Pocketbook Touch HD3 (Past: Kobo Mini, PEZ, PRS-505, Clié)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven Lyle Jordan View Post
A survey cited at TeleRead this morning states that "70 percent of 411 respondents to a survey drawn from a cross section of the publishing industry cited ‘quality’ as the most important consideration when publishing an eBook."

"70 percent?" That's all?

I simply don't know how any publisher could consider anything to be more important than ebook quality. But apparently 30% of them do.
Teleread may have typo'd that: MediaBistro says that 70% Of Publishers Release eBooks For ‘Equality’, meaning usable-on-all-readers (by which they seem to mean, both Adobe & Kindle DRM) Checking the DCL site doesn't turn up actual survey results or even mention; maybe it's a special-subscribers-only thing.

Publishers first being interested in number of sales platforms, followed by cost, sounds much more like what I've come to expect from publishers. I was rather surprised that publishers would say they were "concerned" about quality at all; they seem to be fairly oblivious to the fact that quality issues exist.
Elfwreck is offline   Reply With Quote